PL EN
ORIGINAL PAPER
Evaluating of soil fertility index using a comparative approach: Nutrient Index and Principal Component Analysis in different land uses in Indonesia
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Ir. Sutami Street No. 36A, Kentingan, Surakarta, 57126, Indonesia
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-08-25
 
 
Final revision date: 2026-01-30
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-05-11
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-05-11
 
 
Publication date: 2026-05-11
 
 
Corresponding author
Aktavia Herawati   

Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Ir. Sutami No. 36A, 57126, Surakarta, Indonesia
 
 
Soil Sci. Ann., 2026, 77(2)221711
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
This study aims to evaluate the soil fertility index using the Nutrient Index (NI) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) across different land uses in Mojogedang Subdistrict, Karanganyar Regency, Indonesia. Soil samples were collected using purposive sampling from 14 land map units (LMUs) and analysed in the laboratory for selected soil chemical properties. The laboratory data were processed using the Nutrient Index and Soil Fertility Index methods, with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) derived from correlation analysis and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), followed by scoring to determine the scoring index (Si). According to land-use type, the classification of soil fertility index using two methods yielded different classes in both land uses. The Nutrient Index method showed that the mixed garden had higher soil fertility than the moorland, whereas the values are medium (1.75) and low (1.62), respectively. Meanwhile, the PCA method classified both mixed garden and moorland as medium, with values of 0.54 and 0.51, respectively. However, the soil fertility index for each land map unit differed across land uses. A T-test showed significant differences (p = 0.000) between the two methods. The determining factors in the Nutrient Index method are total N and available P, with land use as the main source of variation (p = 0.002), while in the PCA method are soil pH, organic carbon, available P, cation exchange capacity (CEC) with soil type (p = 0.001) and land use (p = 0.003) as the main sources of variation. The study concludes that the PCA method provides a more comprehensive representation of soil fertility conditions by using a broader set of soil indicators. In contrast, the Nutrient Index method is simpler and easier to apply as it utilizes fewer soil parameters. Understanding the different types of land uses and soil characteristics is crucial for enhancing soil fertility and ensuring sustainable agricultural practices.
REFERENCES (46)
1.
Abdehvand, Z.Z., Karimi, D., Rangzan, K., Mousavi, S.R., 2024. Assessment of soil fertility and nutrient management strategies in calcareous soils of Khuzestan province : a case study using the Nutrient Index Value method. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 196(503). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661....
 
2.
Abdel-Fattah, M.K., Mohamed, E.S., Wagdi, E.M., Shahin, S.A., Aldosari, A.A., Lasaponara, R., Alnaimy, M.A., 2021. Quantitative evaluation of soil quality using principal component analysis: The case study of El-Fayoum depression Egypt. Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1304....
 
3.
AbdelRahman, M.A.E., Hegab, R.H., Yossif, T.M.H., 2021. Soil fertility assessment for optimal agricultural use using remote sensing and GIS technologies. Applied Geomatics 13(4), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518....
 
4.
Ahamad, A., Gupta, A.K., Kumar, D., 2021. Soil fertility evaluation using nutrient index approach. Journal of Krishi Vigyan 10(1), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.5958/2349-4....
 
5.
Ahmed, F., Islam, M.S., Iqbal, M.T., 2017. Biochar amendment improves soil fertility and productivity of mulberry plant. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science (Ejss) 6(3), 226–226. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.....
 
6.
Ali, D., Hussain, A., Begum, F., Lin, C., Ali, S., Ahsan, W.A., Hussain, A., Hussain, F., 2025. Assessing the impact of land use and land cover changes on soil properties and carbon sequestration in the upper Himalayan Region of Gilgit, Pakistan. Sustainable Chemistry One World 5, 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scow....
 
7.
Amara, D.M.K., Patil, P.L., Kamara, A.M., Saidu, D.H., 2017. Assessment of soil fertility status using nutrient index approach. Academia Journal of Agricultural Research 6(ISSN: 2315-7739), 028–038.
 
8.
Arumugam, T., Kinattinkara, S., Vellingiri, K., Arumugam, M., Rajamani, J., Jayaseelan, A., 2025. Assessment of agricultural soil quality in macro and micronutrient analysis of Kasargod, Kerala, India, using GIS techniques. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances 100846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.haza....
 
9.
Asfaw, A., Zewudie, S., 2021. Soil macrofauna abundance, biomass and selected soil properties in the home garden and coffee-based agroforestry systems at Wondo Genet, Ethiopia. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 12, 100153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indi....
 
10.
Awoonor, J.K., Amoako, E.E., Dogbey, B.F., Wiredu, I., 2024. Quantitative analysis of soil degradation in response to land use change in the Guinea savanna zone of Ghana. Geoderma Regional 37(June 2023), e00779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
 
11.
Awoonor, J.K., Amoakwah, E., Buri, M.M., Dogbey, B.F., Gyamfi, J.K., 2025. Impact of land use on soil quality: Insights from the forest-savannah transition zone of Ghana. Heliyon 11(1), e41183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heli....
 
12.
Bagherzadeh, A., Gholizadeh, A., Keshavarzi, A., 2018. Assessment of soil fertility index for potato production using integrated fuzzy and AHP approaches, northeast of Iran. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science 7(3), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.....
 
13.
Chapman, H.D., 1965. Cation-exchange capacity. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2: Chemical and Microbiological Properties 891–901. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronm....
 
14.
Chaudhry, H., Vasava, H.B., Chen, S., Saurette, D., Beri, A., Gillespie, A., Biswas, A., 2024. Evaluating the soil quality index using three methods to assess soil fertility. Sensors 24(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.or....
 
15.
Chi, Y., Sun, J., Fu, Z., Xie, Z., 2020. Which factor determines the spatial variance of soil fertility on uninhabited islands? Geoderma 374(March), 114445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
 
16.
Dewi, W.S., Purwanto, Anisa, S.S., Hartati, S., 2024. Assessing soil fertility index under different forest land cover. Sains Tanah 21(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.20961/stjss....
 
17.
Emami, N.S., Chavoshi, E., Ayoubi, S., Honarjoo, N., Zeraatpisheh, M., 2024. Comprehensive assessment of soil quality in various land uses: A comparative analysis of soil quality index models. Environmental Earth Sciences 83(17), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665....
 
18.
Eviati. et al., 2023. Petunjuk teknis analisis kimia tanah, tanaman, air, dan pupuk (3rd ed.). Bogor: Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia.
 
19.
FAO, 2021. Standard operating procedure for soil pH determination. In International Organization (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1017/S00208....
 
20.
Febriani, S.R., Ariyanto, D.P., Cahyono, O., Tarmadi, D., 2025. The impact of termite activity on soil fertility : A case study in pine stands in the alas bromo education forest area. AgriHealth: Journal of Agri-Food, Nutrition and Public Health 6(1), 21–30.
 
21.
Hairiah, K. et al., 2025. Soil health indicators, farmer concepts and carbon market standards in agroforestation of underutilized lands in West Sumatra (Indonesia). Soil Advances 3(10), 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
 
22.
Ismardani, Y., 2024. Kabupaten Karanganyar dalam Angka. Karanganyar: BPS Kabupaten Karanganyar.
 
23.
Kebalo, L.F., Vieublé Gonod, L., Garnier, P., Houot, S., 2025. Combining bio-based fertilizers with amendment and fertilizing value as a sustainable way for cherry tomato production. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 21(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr....
 
24.
Khadka, D., Lamichhane, S., Shrestha, S.R., Pant, B.B., 2017. Evaluation of soil fertility status of Regional Agricultural Research Station, Tarahara, Sunsari, Nepal. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science (Ejss) 6(4), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.18393/ejss.....
 
25.
Kharal, S., Khanal, B.R., Panday, D., 2018. Assessment of soil fertility under different land-use systems in Dhading District of Nepal. Soil Systems 2(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsy....
 
26.
Lal, R., 1994. Methods and guidlines for assessing sustainable use of soil and water resources in the tropics. Washington: Soil Management Support Service USDA Soil Conservation Service.
 
27.
Lal, R., 2020. Soil organic matter content and crop yield. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 75(2), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.2489/JSWC.7....
 
28.
Legowo, B., Putra, S., Mufti, M.K.I., Purwanto, H., Rifai, H., Suryanto, W., Purnama, B., 2023. Identification pyroclastic flow of magnetic minerals (Holocene volcano): A case study of paleo-volcano Lawu on the south side, Central Java, Indonesia. Kuwait Journal of Science 50(4), 724–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjs.....
 
29.
Lu, D., Dong, Y., Chen, X., Wang, H., Zhou, J., 2022. Comparison of potential potassium leaching associated with organic and inorganic potassium sources in different arable soils in China. Pedosphere 32(2), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-....
 
30.
Mujiyo, Nariyanti, S., Suntoro, Herawati, A., Herdiansyah, G., Irianto, H., Riptanti, E.W., Qonita, A., 2022. Soil fertility index based on altitude: A comprehensive assessment for the cassava development area in Indonesia. Annals of Agricultural Sciences 67(2), 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas....
 
31.
Mukashema, A., 2007. Mapping and modelling landscape-based soil fertility change in relation to human induction. International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation Enschede.
 
32.
Oladele, S.O., 2019. Changes in physicochemical properties and quality index of an Alfisol after three years of rice husk biochar amendment in rainfed rice – Maize cropping sequence. Geoderma 353, 359–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geod....
 
33.
Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S., Dean, L.A., 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. In United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). Washington, D.C.
 
34.
Pal, D.K., Datta, A., Vasu, D., Paul, R., Karthikeyan, K., Tiwary, P., 2025. Pedological and taxonomical research of Indian tropical soils for fulfilling the UN SDGs: Current status and the future scope. Soil Security 18, 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sois....
 
35.
Parker, F.W., Nelson, W.L., Winters, E., Miles, I.E., 1951. The broad interpretation and application of soil test information. Agronomy Journal 43(3), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj....
 
36.
Peña, O.L., Andreote, F.D., Ortiz, J., Soto, J., Arriagada-Escamilla, C., 2025. Rhizobacteria provide resistance to Gaultheria mucronata (Ericaceae) against seasonal variability in volcanic scoria soils. Rhizosphere 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhis....
 
37.
Setiawan, J., Kaswanto, Sjaf, S., Aulia, R., Parahita, A.A., Rohadi, P.P., 2024. Plant biodiversity of mixed garden in Lariang Mamasa Watershed , West Sulawesi. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1....
 
38.
Soil Survey Staff., 2022. Keys to soil taxonomy. In Keys to soil taxonomy (Vol. 13). Retrieved from http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Inter....
 
39.
Suntoro, S., Hikmah, F., Mujiyo, M., Syamsiyah, J., 2023. The distribution of soil fertility index and its interaction with earthworms density under organic semi-organic, and inorganic rice fields. Soil Science Annual 74(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37501/soils....
 
40.
Supriyadi, Mustikaningrum, I.A., Herawati, A., Purwanto, P., Sumani, S., 2018. Soil quality assessment in organic and non organic paddy fields in Susukan, Indonesia. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 24(5), 777–784. Retrieved from https://www.agrojournal.org/24....
 
41.
Walkley, A., Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/000106....
 
42.
Wu, X., Zhang, L., Fan, Q., Wang, X., Deng, A., Xie, Y., Su, B., 2025. A regional comprehensive soil quality evaluation method for orchard green agricultural development: Integrating soil fertility and environmental indicators in Hainan, China. Italian Journal of Agronomy (February), 100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijag....
 
43.
Yang, F., He, B., Dong, B., Zhang, G., 2024. Film-straw dual mulching improves soil fertility and maize yield in dryland farming by increasing straw-degrading bacterial abundance and their positive cooperation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 367(1), 108997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee....
 
44.
Yates, C.A., Johnes, P.J., Spencer, R.G.M., 2016. Assessing the drivers of dissolved organic matter export from two contrasting lowland catchments, U.K. Science of the Total Environment 569–570, 1330–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scit....
 
45.
Zhang, Z., Hu, L., Liu, Y., Guo, Y., Tang, S., Ren, J., 2025. Land use shapes the microbial community structure by altering soil aggregates and dissolved organic matter components. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 24(3), 827–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.....
 
46.
Zhu, X., Shen, Y., Yuan, X., Singh, A. K., Jin, L., Yang, B., Yuan, C., Jiang, X., Liu, W., 2025. Divergent responses of soil aggregate-associated organic carbon fractions and carbon flow pathways to land-use changes in karst ecosystems: Insights from δ13C signature. Catena 249, 108695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cate....
 
eISSN:2300-4975
ISSN:2300-4967
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top