A GIS-based approach to identify the spatial variability of salt affected soil properties and delineation of site-specific management zones: A case study from Egypt
Zagazig University, Faculty of Agriculture, Soil Science Department, Zagazig City, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt, Postal Code 44511, Egypt
Data nadesłania: 29-08-2019
Data akceptacji: 16-03-2020
Data publikacji online: 19-05-2020
Data publikacji: 19-05-2020
Soil Sci. Ann., 2020, 71(1), 76-85
Electrical conductivity of the soil saturated paste extract (ECe), pH and exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) are most important soil properties to determine and design methods of salt-affected soil reclamation. Surface soil samples from 125 locations in Sahl El-Husseinia, El-Sharkia Governorate, Egypt were taken using hand auger and analyzed for ECe, pH, SAR, ESP and CEC. GPS device was used to record the latitude and longitude of each sampling point. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to summarize soil properties. ArcGIS software was used to assess spatial distribution pattern of different soil properties. Interpolation mapping to estimate the values of soil properties at un-sampled locations was conducted using ordinary kriging procedure and semi-variogram models were evaluated. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering technique was utilized to define soil management zones. Observed positive strong significant correlation between ECe and other attributes of soil (i.e. ESP, SAR and CEC) with the exception of pH. The PCA resulted that there are two principal components (PCs) explained 80.27% of the total variance of soil properties. The first PC (explained 59.64% of variability) was strongly influenced by soil ECe, SAR, ESP and CEC whereas the second PC showed a more intense relation with pH only. Soil ECe, pH and CEC were pentaspherical, exponential and stable respectively as a best-fit model. Meanwhile, the Spherical model was the best-fit model to SAR and ESP. Based on agglomerative hierarchical clustering, three soil management zones (SMZ) were selected differing significantly with respect to studied soil properties. Calculations for each SMZ concerning gypsum requirements (GR) to reduce ESP to 10 as well as water amount were carried out to reduce ECe to 2 dS m-1. The amounts of GR are 6.10, 7.05 and 13.37 Mg ha-1 for SMZ1, SMZ2 and SMZ3, respectively. The amounts of leaching water requirements (LR) for leaching salts from the soil are 2.98, 4.25 and 5.57 m3 ha-1 (×1000) for SMZ1, SMZ2 and SMZ3 respectively.
Abdi, H., Williams, L. J., 2010. Principal component analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2, 433-459.
Behera, S.K., Mathur, R.K., Shukla, A.K., Suresh, K., Prakash, C., 2018. Spatial variability of soil properties and delineation of soil management zones of oil palm plantations grown in a hot and humid tropical region of southern India. Catena 165, 251–259.
Bekele, A., Hudnall, W.H., 2006. Spatial variability of soil chemical properties of a prairie–forest transition in Louisiana. Plant and Soil 280, 7–21.
Burrough, P., 1983. Problems of superimposed effects in the statistical study of the spatial variation of soil. Agricultural Water Management 6, 123–143.
Burrough, P.A., 1989. Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation. Journal of Soil Science 40, 477–492.
Camacho-Tamayo, J.H., Luengas, C.A., Leiva, F.R., 2008. Effect of agricultural intervention on the spatial variability of some soils chemical properties in the eastern plains of Colombia. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 68, 42–55.
Cambardella, C. et al., 1994. Field-scale variability of soil properties in central Iowa soils. Soil Science society of America Journal 58, 1501–1511.
Corwin, D., Lesch, S., 2005. Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity: I. Survey protocols. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 46, 103–133.
Cruz, J.S., Júnior, R.N.A., Matias, S.S.R., Camacho-Tamayo, J.H., 2011. Spatial variability of an Alfisol cultivated with sugarcane. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria 38, 155–164.
De la Rosa, D., 1979. Relation of several pedological characteristics to engineering qualities of soil. Journal of Soil Science 30, 793–799.
Elaalem, M., 2017. Spatial Variability of Some Soil Chemical Proprieties in Jeffara Plain, Libya (Case Study: Tripoli, Wadi Almjainin and Bin Ghashir). Libyan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22, 19–34.
Fahad, A.A.S., R. M.; Al-Siaykaly, A. A. and Razaq, I. B., 1993. Spatial Variability of Field Soil Salinity Using Geostatistical Techniques. Basra, Journal Agricultural Science, 6, 1.
Fraisse, C., Sudduth, K., Kitchen, N., Fridgen, J., 1999. Use of unsupervised clustering algorithms for delineating within field management zones. ASAE Paper No. 993043. In ‘International Meeting’. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 18–21 July. (American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St. Joseph, MI).
Goovaerts, P., 1997. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York.
Goovaerts, P., 1998. Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Biology and Fertility of Soils 27, 315–334.
Gundogdu, K.S., Guney, I., 2007. Spatial analyses of groundwater levels using universal kriging. Journal of Earth System Science 116, 49–55.
Hosseini, E., Gallichand, J., Marcotte, D., 1994. Theoretical and experimental performance of spatial interpolation methods for soil salinity analysis. Transactions of the ASAE 37, 1799–1807.
Jabro, J., Stevens, W., Evans, R., Iversen, W., 2010. Spatial variability and correlation of selected soil properties in the Ap horizon of a CRP grassland. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 26, 419–428.
Johnston, K., Hoef, J.M.V., Krivoruchko, K., Lucas. N., 2001. Using ArcGIS Geostatistical Analysis. GIS User Manual by ESRI, New York.
Kerry, R., Oliver, M., 2004. Average variograms to guide soil sampling. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 5, 307–325.
Knotters, M., Brus, D., Voshaar, J.O., 1995. A comparison of kriging, co-kriging and kriging combined with regression for spatial interpolation of horizon depth with censored observations. Geoderma 67, 227–246.
Li, J., Heap, A.D., 2008. A review of spatial interpolation methods for environmental scientists. Geoscience Australia, Record 2008/23, 137 pp.
López-Granados, F., Jurado-Expósito, M., Atenciano, S., García-Ferrer, A., de la Orden, M. S., and García-Torres, L., 2002. Spatial variability of agricultural soil parameters in southern Spain. Plant and Soil 246, 97–105.
Oliver, M., 2010. Geostatistical Applications for Precision Agriculture. Springer, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg and Tokyo.
Overstreet, R., Martin, J.C., King, H.M., 1951. Gypsum, sulfur, and sulfuric acid for reclaiming an alkali soil fo the Fresno series. Hilgardia 21(5):113-127.
Reeve, R.C., 1957. The relation of salinity to irrigation and drainage requirements. In: Proc. 3rd Int. Congr. Irrigation and Drainage, San Francisco, 10, 175–187.
Richards, L.A., 1969. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. United States Department Of Agriculture, Washington.
Santra, P., Chopra, U., Chakraborty, D., 2008. Spatial variability of soil properties and its application in predicting surface map of hydraulic parameters in an agricultural farm. Current Science, 95, 7, 937-945.
Stein, A., Hoogerwerf, M., Bouma, J., 1988. Use of soil-map delineations to improve (co-) kriging of point data on moisture deficits. Geoderma 43, 163–177.
Talkkari, A., Jauhiainen, L., Yli-Halla, M., 2002. Geostatistical prediction of clay percentage based on soil survey data. Agricultural and Food Science 11, 381–390.
Templeton, G.F., 2011. A Two-Step Approach for Transforming Continuous Variables to Normal: Implications and Recommendations for IS Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 28(4), 41–58.
Usowicz, B., Hajnos M., Sokołowska, Z., Józefaciuk, G., Bowanko, G., Kossowski, J., 2004. Spatial variability of physical and chemical soil properties in a field and commune scale. Acta Agrophysica, Rozprawy i monografie 103, 337-247.
Van Reeuwijk, L.P., 2002. Procedures for soil analysis. No. 9. International Soil Reference and Information Centre.
Verfaillie, E., Van Lancker, V., Van Meirvenne, M., 2006. Multivariate geostatistics for the predictive modelling of the surficial sand distribution in shelf seas. Continental Shelf Research 26, 2454–2468.
White, J., Welch, R., Norvell, W., 1997. Soil zinc map of the USA using geostatistics and geographic information systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61, 185–194.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top