KRÓTKI KOMUNIKAT
L-arginine application triggered soil hydrolytic activity
1
Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, Iran
Data nadesłania: 23-08-2022
Data ostatniej rewizji: 09-12-2022
Data akceptacji: 11-02-2023
Data publikacji online: 12-02-2023
Data publikacji: 19-05-2023
Autor do korespondencji
Sajedeh Khosrozadeh
Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, 84156-83111, Isfahan, Iran
Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology, 84156-83111, Isfahan, Iran
Soil Sci. Ann., 2023, 74(1)161147
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
STRESZCZENIE
Application of amino acids to soils is reportedly associated with controversial responses in soil enzyme activities. The effects of L-arginine application on the fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolysis and protease activity in an oak forest soil was investigated. The FDA hydrolysis and protease activity were regularly measured over a standard incubation period. The addition of L-arginine increased both FDA hydrolysis and protease activity after a lag time of 10 days. After 30 days, the ratio of FDA hydrolysis and protease activity in L-arginine-amended soil samples to those in the control reached 2.0 and 3.7, respectively. Moreover, FDA hydrolysis was found significantly (r = 0.67, P < 0.05) correlated with protease activity. It was concluded that L-arginine was able to stimulate FDA hydrolysis and protease activity, thereby making the soil hydrolytic system capable of facing more complicated substrates.
REFERENCJE (30)
1.
Adam, G., Duncan, H., 2001. Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 33(7), 943-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-....
2.
Alef, K., Nannipieri, P., 1995. Enzyme activities, [In] K. Alef, P. Nannipieri (Eds.), Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, London, pp. 311-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0....
3.
Allison, S.D., Vitousek, P.M., 2005. Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37(5), 937-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
4.
Andersson, M., Kjøller, A., Struwe, S., 2004. Microbial enzyme activities in leaf litter, humus and mineral soil layers of European forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 36(10), 1527-1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
5.
Bremner, J.M., 1996. Nitrogen-Total, [In] D.L. Sparks, A.L. Page, P.A. Helmke, R.H. Loeppert (Eds.), Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical method-SSSA Book series no.5. Soil Science Society of America : American Society of Agronomy, Madison, USA, pp. 1085-1121.
6.
Burt, R., 2004. Soil survey laboratory methods manual: soil survey investigation (Report No. 42, version 4.0), Department of Agriculture, Washangton, D.C; U.S. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/....
7.
Criquet, S., Tagger, S., Vogt, G., Le Petit, J., 2002. Endoglucanase and β-glycosidase activities in an evergreen oak litter: annual variation and regulating factors. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 34(8), 1111-1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-....
8.
Eilers, K.G., Lauber, C.L., Knight, R., Fierer, N., 2010. Shifts in bacterial community structure associated with inputs of low molecular weight carbon compounds to soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 42(6), 896-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
9.
Gaspar, M.L., Cabello, M.N., Pollero, R., Aon, M.A., 2001. Fluorescein Diacetate Hydrolysis as a Measure of Fungal Biomass in Soil. Current Microbiology 42(5), 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284....
10.
Geisseler, D., Horwath, W.R., 2008. Regulation of extracellular protease activity in soil in response to different sources and concentrations of nitrogen and carbon. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 40(12), 3040-3048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
11.
Geisseler, D., Horwath, W.R., 2009. Relationship between carbon and nitrogen availability and extracellular enzyme activities in soil. Pedobiologia 53(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedo....
12.
Graham, M.H., Haynes, R.J., 2005. Organic matter accumulation and fertilizer-induced acidification interact to affect soil microbial and enzyme activity on a long-term sugarcane management experiment. Biology and Fertility of Soils 41(4), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374....
13.
Green, V.S., Stott, D.E., Diack, M., 2006. Assay for fluorescein diacetate hydrolytic activity: Optimization for soil samples. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 38(4), 693-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
14.
Halsey, C.R., Lei, S., Wax, J.K., Lehman, M.K., Nuxoll, A.S., Steinke, L., Sadykov, M., Powers, R., Fey, P.D., 2017. Amino Acid Catabolism in Staphylococcus aureus and the Function of Carbon Catabolite Repression. mBio 8(1), e01434-01416. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.0....
15.
Haynes, R.J., 1999. Size and activity of the soil microbial biomass under grass and arable management. Biology and Fertility of Soils 30(3), 210-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374....
16.
Jones, D.L., Healey, J.R., Willett, V.B., Farrar, J.F., Hodge, A., 2005. Dissolved organic nitrogen uptake by plants—an important N uptake pathway? Soil Biology and Biochemistry 37(3), 413-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soil....
17.
Jones, D.L., Hughes, L.T., Murphy, D.V., Healey, J.R., 2008. Dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen dynamics in temperate coniferous forest plantations. European Journal of Soil Science 59(6), 1038-1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
18.
Lundgren, B., 1981. Fluorescein Diacetate as a Stain of Metabolically Active Bacteria in Soil. Oikos 36(1), 17-22. 10.2307/3544373.
19.
McMahon, S., Schimel, J.P., 2017. Shifting patterns of microbial N-metabolism across seasons in upland Alaskan tundra soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 105(96-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.so....
20.
Nannipieri, P., Muccini, L., Ciardi, C., 1983. Microbial biomass and enzyme activities: Production and persistence. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 15(6), 679-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0....
21.
Nourbakhsh, F., 2007. Decoupling of soil biological properties by deforestation. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 121(4), 435-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee....
22.
Perucci, P., 1992. Enzyme activity and microbial biomass in a field soil amended with municipal refuse. Biology and Fertility of Soils 14(1), 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0033....
23.
Renella, G., Szukics, U., Landi, L., Nannipieri, P., 2007. Quantitative assessment of hydrolase production and persistence in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 44(2), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374....
24.
Sánchez-Monedero, M.A., Mondini, C., Cayuela, M.L., Roig, A., Contin, M., De Nobili, M., 2008. Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis, respiration and microbial biomass in freshly amended soils. Biology and Fertility of Soils 44(6), 885-890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374....
25.
SAS Institute, 2013. SAS Procedures Guide, Version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
26.
Schloter, M., Dilly, O., Munch, J.C., 2003. Indicators for evaluating soil quality. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 98(1), 255-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-....
27.
Schnürer, J., Rosswall, T., 1982. Fluorescein Diacetate Hydrolysis as a Measure of Total Microbial Activity in Soil and Litter. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 43(6), 1256-1261. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.43....
28.
Sharma, A.K., Singh, S.P., 2016. Effect of amino acids on the repression of alkaline protease synthesis in haloalkaliphilic Nocardiopsis dassonvillei. Biotechnology Reports 12(40-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre....
29.
Sims, G.K., Wander, M.M., 2002. Proteolytic activity under nitrogen or sulfur limitation. Applied Soil Ecology 19(3), 217-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-....
30.
Stubberfield, L.C.F., Shaw, P.J.A., 1990. A comparison of tetrazolium reduction and FDA hydrolysis with other measures of microbial activity. Journal of Microbiological Methods 12(3), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7....
Udostępnij
ARTYKUŁ POWIĄZANY
Przetwarzamy dane osobowe zbierane podczas odwiedzania serwisu. Realizacja funkcji pozyskiwania informacji o użytkownikach i ich zachowaniu odbywa się poprzez dobrowolnie wprowadzone w formularzach informacje oraz zapisywanie w urządzeniach końcowych plików cookies (tzw. ciasteczka). Dane, w tym pliki cookies, wykorzystywane są w celu realizacji usług, zapewnienia wygodnego korzystania ze strony oraz w celu monitorowania ruchu zgodnie z Polityką prywatności. Dane są także zbierane i przetwarzane przez narzędzie Google Analytics (więcej).
Możesz zmienić ustawienia cookies w swojej przeglądarce. Ograniczenie stosowania plików cookies w konfiguracji przeglądarki może wpłynąć na niektóre funkcjonalności dostępne na stronie.
Możesz zmienić ustawienia cookies w swojej przeglądarce. Ograniczenie stosowania plików cookies w konfiguracji przeglądarki może wpłynąć na niektóre funkcjonalności dostępne na stronie.